1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Rate video
Ø Rating: 4.50


The Koch Brothers

Charles and David Koch are each worth about $25bn, which makes them the fourth richest Americans. When you combine their fortunes, they are the third wealthiest people in the world. Radical libertarians who use their money to oppose government and virtually all regulation as interference with the free market, the Kochs are in a class of their own as players on the American political stage. Their web of influence in the US stretches from state capitals to the halls of congress in Washington DC.

The Koch brothers fueled the conservative Tea Party movement that vigorously opposes Barack Obama, the US president. They fund efforts to derail action on global warming, and support politicians who object to raising taxes on corporations or the wealthy to help fix America’s fiscal problems. According to New Yorker writer Jane Mayer, who wrote a groundbreaking exposé of the Kochs in 2010, they have built a top to bottom operation to shape public policy that has been “incredibly effective. They are so rich that their pockets are almost bottomless, and they can keep pouring money into this whole process”.

Koch industries, the second largest privately-held company in the US, is an oil refining, chemical, paper products and financial services company with revenues of a $100bn a year. Virtually every American household has some Koch product – from paper towels and lumber, to Stainmaster carpet and Lycra in sports clothes, to gasoline for cars. The Koch’s political philosophy of rolling back environmental and financial regulations is also beneficial to their business interests.

The Kochs rarely talk to the press, and conduct their affairs behind closed doors. But at a secret meeting of conservative activists and funders the Kochs held in Vail, Colorado this past summer, someone made undercover recordings. One caught Charles Koch urging participants to dig deep into their pockets to defeat Obama. “This is the mother of all wars we’ve got in the next 18 months,” he says, “for the life or death of this country.” He called out the names of 31 people at the Vail meeting who each contributed more than $1m over the past 12 months.

In the 2010 congressional elections, the Kochs and their partners spent at least $40m, helping to swing the balance of power in the US House of Representatives towards right-wing Tea Party Republicans. It has been reported that the Kochs are planning to raise and spend more than $200m to defeat Obama in 2012. But the brothers could easily kick in more without anyone knowing due to loopholes in US law.

The Kochs founded and provide millions to Americans for Prosperity, a political organisation that builds grassroots support for conservative causes and candidates. Americans for Prosperity, which has 33 state chapters and claims to have about two million members, has close ties to Tea Party groups and played a key role in opposing Obama’s health care initiative.

This year, Americans for Prosperity spent at least half a million dollars supporting Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker’s efforts to cut social spending and roll back collective bargaining rights for public employee unions. The legislation passed by Walker makes it more difficult for unions, which are major backers of Democratic candidates, to secure funds for political purposes. Americans for Prosperity is also very active in a battle against unions in Ohio, another important 2012 presidential state. Its president, Tim Phillips, says that the organisation is winning in Wisconsin and around the country “because on the policies of economic freedom, we’re right”. He refused to tell People & Power reporter Bob Abeshouse how much the organisation is spending to combat the unions.

The Kochs have also poured millions into think tanks and academia to influence the battle over ideas. According to Kert Davies, the director of research for Greenpeace in the US, the Kochs have spent more than $50m since 1998 on “various front groups and think tanks who … oppose the consensus view that climate change is real, urgent and we have to do something about it”. As operators of oil pipelines and refineries, the Kochs have opposed all efforts to encourage alternative sources of energy by imposing a tax on fossil fuels.

Patrick Michaels, a senior fellow at the CATO Institute, often appears in the media to contest global warming science. CATO was founded by Charles Koch, and the Kochs and their foundations have contributed about $14m to CATO. Since 2009, there has been a sharp drop in the percentage of Americans who see global warming as a serious threat according to Gallup polls. Davies argues that the change can be attributed in large measure to the efforts of scientists like Michaels and others who are funded by the fossil fuel industry.

The Kochs have also promoted their free market ideology and business interests through aggressive lobbying in Washington DC, and financial support of political candidates. Greenpeace has tracked more than $50m that Koch Industries has spent on lobbyists since 2006, when Cap and Trade and other legislation to combat global warming was being considered. The Kochs have been the largest political spender since 2000 in the energy sector, exceeding Exxon, Chevron, and other major players.

The Kochs contributed to 62 of the 87 new members of the US House of Representatives in 2010. Members of the House Energy and Commerce Committee that the Kochs supported have taken the lead in opposing US Environmental Protection Agency efforts to reduce global warming emissions. Other members backed by the Kochs belong to the right-wing Tea Party bloc that took the US to the brink of default in July by refusing to consider a budget deal that would include tax increases.

In 2012, many believe that President Obama can raise a billion dollars for the presidential race, and break all fundraising records. But as Lee Fang of the Center for American Progress tells reporter Bob Abeshouse, in the end it may not matter “because the Koch brothers alone increased their wealth by $11bn in the last two years”.

  • Alexis

    My first criticism is the fact that this documentary does not include complete quotes, often cutting off key pieces of the dialogue. My second criticism is that the Koch's did not form libertarian policies themselves; they base their philosophy on literature and economic systems that have been formed throughout history. My third critique is that there is nothing wrong with proposing ideas and advocating beliefs; within this people have the opportunity to agree or disagree with ideas. There is nothing wrong with think tanks (i.e. AFP) beginning a grassroots cause, in order to be a grassroots movement you need the support of people. Five, what is wrong with the tea party? Six, I myself hold conservative, libertarian values, and my bank account is routinely at zero; the argument that libertarians and conservatives are mostly rich is entirely false. The movement is not "rich against poor" it is philosophy versus philosophy. I also resent the connotations that are associated with the words "progressive" versus "free market;" though I own the term free market wholey, "progressives" constantly attempt to dismantle our legitimacy by accusing libertarians and free market supporters by attacking emotions: saying that we are heartless, against equality, etc. The term "progressive" makes one believe these ideas are futuristic and positive, when in reality they focus end-point equality which often dismantles incentive system and essentially pulls a Robin-hood by stealing from the rich and giving to the poor. In terms of ALEC, every accusation against the organization is either completely false or misrepresented. Model representation is model representation and means nothing without the approval of state legislatures who approve of such legislation and have been given the power to do so from the citizens. I would also argue that any organization that promotes the voice of its citizens, whether individuals or companies, is entirely legitimate and fair given our rights as Americans to free speech. As for the climate debate, this is never ending among and between all parties and the fact that this documentary attempts to point the finger at free market organizations simply highlights the ridiculousness of these arguments. And for the record, one need only look at the details of a few EPA regulations to find the inefficiency and circular tendencies of its products.  For the financial crisis lets please at least look into the incentive systems created by the federal government such as the 1997 act that forced banks to provide loans to individuals not deserving of them (one example of many). This is one side argument driven by emotion and desire to destroy the right or middle with little to no factual basis, and misconstrued "facts." 

    • Enlightenedfinancials

      Was this written by a publicist for the Koch Brothers?   When one family can literally influence all
      U S political debate by using their unlimited wealth to push their personal and business agendas, we are in very serious trouble.   And for the politicians who have been bought and paid for by these people, I consider them traitors to their country!

  • Thank god for people like the Kochs.  They oppose what ails this country.  And the Zombie brain dead liberals.  

Duration: 24:46
Language: EN
Resolution max: 720p
Video Source: YouTube
Provided by: Al Jazeera English
Published on: 2011-10-27
Rating: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
Rate video
Ø Rating: 4.50